Archive for the ‘Final Cut Pro’ Category

Final Cut Studio 3 Released

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

I feel required to write something quick about this release.  For all those using this popular software, here are my quick impressions.

Positives:

  • Improved Speed Control in Final Cut (they have been lacking)
  • Greatly improved integration with Color (1st version of Color was somewhat of an eyesore compared to the suite)
  • Greatly improved 3D capabilities of Motion (still not After Effects)
  • Burn DVDs and Blu-rays straight from Compressor

Negatives:

  • STILL NO BLU-RAY MENU OPTIONS OR BURNING FROM DVD STUDIO PRO (sorry about the yelling, but this bugs me)
  • No other upgrades to DVD SP.  Random prediction, but I think Apple is looking to dump this program completely.  It has not been seriously updated in like 6 years (not cited).
  • For those of you that liked LiveType – get used to Motion.  It looks like LiveType has been removed as a stand alone program. (this is actually a plus in my book)
  • 50 GB load of entire studio with the extras.  For those who think Adobe is bloated…if you have this and Creative Suite on the same computer you better have a lot of storage space.

Final Verdict: *shrug*

If you use Motion for your motion graphics, I would definitely say upgrade.  The same goes if you are doing FCP workflow and use Color to do color correction and grading.  Otherwise, not sure how worth it it is, though at $300 for the upgrade, I suppose you might as well.  Would have definitely liked to see some improvements to DVD SP and maybe some other features like the audio transcription that Adobe has been putting into Premiere/Soundbooth/Media Encoder.

I am a little interested in jumping back into Motion, since I have not really seriously used it since the first version of the program.

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.  If you get it and try it, let me know if there is anything really big that I am missing here.

Here is the official Apple site: http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/

Video User Groups

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

While our fair city of Milwaukee hosts its share of web and print related user groups and events, there seems to be a noticeable lack of video or motion graphics related user groups.  This may be due partly to the nature of the craft where we would rather watch video podcasts about the subject than sit in a lecture style room, but it still begs the question.

Why is video not as loved?

I personally love editing and creating motion graphics and I know there are others of you out there that share my passion.  If you are interested in meet-ups or know of good ones that already exist I welcome comment to this post.  Whether it is Final Cut Pro, Avid, Premiere, After Effects, Vegas, or something else that gets your heart beating  – please sound off.

Video needs a good home.  And Milwaukee is a good home.

What NLE should I learn?

Monday, December 8th, 2008

Some of my students have asked me over the years, which is the best non-linear editor to learn? There is only one answer I can give them.

It depends.

This is not just because I don’t like to give firm answers. The truth is there is a lot of reasons to learn different editing software. Here is the rundown of some of the main editing systems, and their advantages. Also this is biased towards the Milwaukee market, as that is where my current experience comes from. Each market is slightly different. This does not apply to New York or L.A.

Adobe Premiere: They recently had a new release of this software in the new CS4 package. The editor has had some greatly improved functionality, especially in the media browser. The transcription program is neat but awful in terms of accuracy. It works great as part of the Adobe suite, which is such a good package of software that it seems a shame to use all Adobe products except for the editor.

Who uses it? Mostly corporate locations that buy the package as a whole and tell their print graphics designers to learn how to edit using this software that they bought. Also I noticed that when working in D.C. that the government agencies use it a lot.

Good for price and the software has caught up tremendously in the last four years. Still not quite as good as the top dogs but good enough that you will likely not find anything that you can’t do in it that you want. They teach this in a lot of schools which leads to people using this as freelancers but most production houses still are too snobbish to use Premiere. It is cross-platform which is a huge plus.

Apple Final Cut Pro: The Final Cut Pro suite is great. Final Cut Pro is a tremendously useful editor, though it would be nice if it could be transfered more easily to other editing systems (as is true with all of them). Motion 3 is the best yet and is quickly giving After Effects more of a run for its money. Soundtrack has always been a cool tool, and in combination with the Mac software Garageband, makes music making a much easier task. Livetype is by now a dinosaur and should be removed since you can do it all in Motion. DVD Studio Pro needs an upgrade (Blu-ray!!!!) but is still a very powerful authoring tool.

Who uses it? To be perfectly honest, every time I have heard of freelance jobs needed (in general) it has been for Final Cut Pro. Boutique production houses and design firms are gaga for Apple, so they like Final Cut Pro as well. I am ambivalent on this, but I have worked now in Mac shops for the last 7 years. They are gaining traction in bigger firms as well as the suite is quite convenient.

If you have a Mac and you love your Mac, use it. If you want to find the most freelance opportunities in this area, this is probably your safest bet. It will do everything you want and more. If you like PC, then you cannot use this.

Avid Express Pro (or Media Composer): To be honest I have not had the opportunity to even use an Avid in five years. My basis for this is based on my historical use of it. Still the “big” dog of the field, Avid is the top name in video and film editing. That does not necessarily make it the best choice. As more and more places switch over to software based editors, the advantages of the Avid dissipate quickly.

Who uses it? Big ad firms, powerful production houses. If you want the best jobs, know Avid. It looks much more impressive than Final Cut Pro. You aren’t likely to get as many freelance jobs, but these are the decent staff jobs.

Only for the PC (though they sometimes pretend to make MAC versions, everyone knows better). Market share shrinking. But at the end of the day it looks the best on the resume….unless the shop uses only a different editor.

Sony Vegas: Let me say this up front. I have only barely used this. And never for a job. This software is neat and has everything you need in one program (unlike say FCP or Premiere where you really need to go to things like After Effects and Motion). It is also quite popular in Wisconsin (which I hear is partly due to the fact that it was partly developed in the Madison area).

Who uses it? Established freelance veterans. It seems like people who have been at it for some time gravitate to this software. It definitely has some advantages, mainly that as part of the Sony line it interfaces better with its own products which means that Sony cameras and Blu-ray technology is much better placed.

Only for the PC, but cool, cool program. Not very popular so people may not even know what the program is.

So what does this all mean – you still haven’t answered the question.

Basically it does not matter which editor you know, as long as you can edit. Practice as much as possible and at least get your hands on each software. This will give you the basis to edit with any of them – and flexibility is so often the name of the game now.

Cool way to learn keyboard shortcuts

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

Another reason for me to geek out. Now everyone can learn the Apple keyboard shortcuts for Photoshop, Aperture, Final Cut Pro, After Effects and more! Photojojo has release a new series of keyboard skins for your mac with pre-printed shortcuts for many popular applications! Check out the product and order here!

FAQ: Final Cut Pro: Transitions

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

One of the most common questions I get from former students in Final Cut Pro is this:

How come sometimes I can’t put my transition in the place that I want it? (see pic)

Well, while there could be a couple of reasons, the most common reason is due to “handles” on the media.

Imagine it like this.

The way a transition works, in this case the cross dissolve, it grabs the 15 frames before and after the edit point for both clips to create an evenly fading transition.

Since there is available data on either side, Final Cut Pro will use these frames to form part of the transition, although you originally edited this out. So be warned, if you are using transitions, be mindful of what is in this handle. There is probably a reason you edited it in the first place.

You may come across flashes of other shots, or an errant clapper, because of this.

If you have two clips together that do not have an extra 15 frames in either direction, then this transition cannot occur.

See how in the diagram, the transition does not have enough frames from Clip 2 to make a full transition. You could choose to have this transition “begin at the edit”, as there is more than enough handle in Clip 1 to accommodate.

If your transition cannot happen, you will likely see the little ‘x’ next to the transition icon inside of Final Cut Pro.

One neat thing about Premiere (though I am working on memory here – so don’t quote me) is that it will interpret every frame before the first (or everyone after the last) as a freeze frame. This allows the transition to happen, even if you do not have the handles.

Part of the reason I bring this up, is that this can be a good workaround if you need to squeeze a couple of extra frames out of a transition. Make a freeze frame before or after the clip that needs it, then nest (precompose) it. Now the transition should work.

If all else is failing – make sure you are not putting an audio transition on the video, or vice versa. Trust me – I do this more times than I can count.

Final Cut Studio: Apple ProRes 422

Wednesday, November 7th, 2007

So you have opened up your new Final Cut Studio 2 Box and you have been playing with Final Cut. Sure, the open format timeline and the motion templates are really cool. But what the heck is ProRes 422, and why is it a big deal?

Originally on this post I had put a link to the Apple White Page which talked about the codec, but within an hour, the link had gone down. Interesting…

Anyway, check out this long article by Creative Cow member, Tim Wilson: Click here

Well now the site for the white paper is back up, so you can see it here: Click here

Final Cut Pro – Quick Tip #1

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

You know how useful markers are in the timeline – giving you the ability to jump between areas of a sequence like chapters in a DVD (and also useful for making those DVD chapters)? This is only one application of the marker.

Especially when working with a long clip of voiceover, using markers can be helpful for making quick subclips…without specifically making subclips. As well as creating the markers, they can be quickly renamed or simply numbered to match the block numbers in scripts.

You can use the markers in the browser just like subclips, moving them directly down into the timeline as a pretrimmed clip. Each marker’s length is equal to the input of that marker to the in point of the next marker.

Next time you are working with long clips think about using markers. It will organize your work and is very quick!

 

Adobe Quark logo